Paper detail

Bottomium suppression in PbPb collisions at LHC energies

We substantially refine our previously developed model for the suppression of Upsilon mesons in the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) formed in 2.76 TeV PbPb collisions at the LHC. It accounts for gluodissociation of the six bottomium states Y(nS), chi_b(nP) with n = 1,2,3, collisional damping of these states as described in a complex potential, screening of the real part of the potential, and the subsequent decay cascade. In the hydrodynamical calculation of the expanding fireball, we take into account the effect of transverse expansion on the suppression factors, and finite transverse momenta of the heavy mesons in the medium. The running of the coupling is considered, resulting in larger gluodissociation decay widths. The initial central temperature is found to be 550 MeV at 0.1 fm/c. Our results are in good agreement with recent centrality-dependent CMS and ALICE data. The calculated suppression of the excited states relative to the ground state Y(1S) is not strong enough in peripheral collisions. Additional mechanisms are discussed. Predictions for 5.52 TeV are made.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.