Paper detail

Boolean algebras and Lubell functions

Let $2^{[n]}$ denote the power set of $[n]:=\{1,2,..., n\}$. A collection $\B\subset 2^{[n]}$ forms a $d$-dimensional {\em Boolean algebra} if there exist pairwise disjoint sets $X_0, X_1,..., X_d \subseteq [n]$, all non-empty with perhaps the exception of $X_0$, so that $\B={X_0\cup \bigcup_{i\in I} X_i\colon I\subseteq [d]}$. Let $b(n,d)$ be the maximum cardinality of a family $\F\subset 2^X$ that does not contain a $d$-dimensional Boolean algebra. Gunderson, Rödl, and Sidorenko proved that $b(n,d) \leq c_d n^{-1/2^d} \cdot 2^n$ where $c_d= 10^d 2^{-2^{1-d}}d^{d-2^{-d}}$. In this paper, we use the Lubell function as a new measurement for large families instead of cardinality. The Lubell value of a family of sets $\F$ with $\F\subseteq \tsupn$ is defined by $h_n(\F):=\sum_{F\in \F}1/{n\choose |F|}$. We prove the following Turán type theorem. If $\F\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ contains no $d$-dimensional Boolean algebra, then $h_n(\F)\leq 2(n+1)^{1-2^{1-d}}$ for sufficiently large $n$. This results implies $b(n,d) \leq C n^{-1/2^d} \cdot 2^n$, where $C$ is an absolute constant independent of $n$ and $d$. As a consequence, we improve several Ramsey-type bounds on Boolean algebras. We also prove a canonical Ramsey theorem for Boolean algebras.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.