Paper detail

Bonding Nature, Structural Optimization, and Energetics studies of SiC Graphitic-Like layer Structures and Single/Double Walled Nanotubes

The structural optimization and energetics studies of SiC graphitic-like structures have been investigated theoretically in the context of formations of stable graphitic-like layer structures, single- and multi-walled nanotubes using the DFT-based Vienna ab-inito simulation package. The bonding nature of atoms in the optimized structures has been examined using a local analysis technique based on a self-consistent and environment-dependent semi-empirical Hamiltonian. Results of our studies reveal that stabilized SiC graphitic-like layer structures possess the sp2 bonding nature, different from the sp3 bonding nature in bulk SiC. Such flexibility in bonding configurations between Si and C atoms holds the possibility for a wide range of stable SiC-based structures, similar to those for carbon-based structures. In the case of SiC-based nanotubes, we have calculated quantities such as the strain energy, the degree of buckle in the cylindrical shell, and bond charges between Si and C atoms, to obtain an understanding of the optimized structures. The optimized interlayer spacing of SiC graphitic-like multilayer sheets has been found to depend on the ordering of atoms in different layers of the SiC graphitic-like structure (0.37 nm for the Si-C sequence of bilayer arrangement versus 0.48 nm for either the Si-Si or the C-C sequence of bilayer arrangement). These observations may be attributed to the Coulomb interactions due to the charge redistribution among Si and C atoms. On the other hand, the existence of two different ranges of interlayer separation in SiC double-walled nanotubes (0.38 nm for zigzag and 0.48 nm for armchair) is found to be related to whether the dominant interlayer neighbors are of the Si-C type or the Si-Si and C-C types.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.