Paper detail

Bohr-van Leeuwen theorem and the thermal Casimir effect for conductors

The problem of estimating the thermal corrections to Casimir and Casimir-Polder interactions in systems involving conducting plates has attracted considerable attention in the recent literature on dispersion forces. Alternative theoretical models, based on distinct low-frequency extrapolations of the plates reflection coefficient for transverse electric (TE) modes, provide widely different predictions for the magnitude of this correction. In this paper we examine the most widely used prescriptions for this reflection coefficient from the point of view of their consistency with the Bohr-van Leeuwen theorem of classical statistical physics, stating that at thermal equilibrium transverse electromagnetic fields decouple from matter in the classical limit. We find that the theorem is satisfied if and only if the TE reflection coefficient vanishes at zero frequency in the classical limit. This criterion appears to rule out some of the models that have been considered recently for describing the thermal correction to the Casimir pressure with non-magnetic metallic plates.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.