Paper detail

Bohman-Frieze processes at criticality and emergence of the giant component

The evolution of the usual Erdős-Rényi random graph model on n vertices can be described as follows: At time 0 start with the empty graph, with n vertices and no edges. Now at each time k, choose 2 vertices uniformly at random and attach an edge between these two vertices. Let \bfG_n(k) be the graph obtained at step k. Refined analysis in random graph theory now shows that for fixed t\in \Rbold, when k(n) = n/2+ n^{2/3} t/2, the sizes of the components in \bfG_n(k(n)) scale like n^{2/3} and rescaled component sizes converge to the standard multiplicative coalescent at time $t$. The last decade has seen variants of this process introduced, under the name Achlioptas processes, to understand the effect of simple changes in the edge formation scheme on the emergence of the giant component. Stimulated by a question of Achlioptas, one of the simplest and most popular of such models is the Bohman Frieze (BF) model wherein at each stage $k$, 2 edges e_1(k)=(v_1,v_2) and e_2(k) = (v_3, v_4) are chosen uniformly at random. If at this time v_1, v_2 are both isolated then this edge is added, otherwise e_2 is added. Then \cite{bohman2001avoiding} (and further analysis in \cite{spencer2007birth}) show that once again there is a critical parameter, which is larger than 1, above and below which the asymptotic behavior is as in the Erdős-Rényi setting. While an intense study for this and related models seems to suggest that at criticality, this model should be in the same universality class as the original Erdős-Rényi process, a precise mathematical treatment of the dynamics in the critical window has to date escaped analysis. In this work we study the component structure of the BF model in the critical window and show that at criticality the sizes of components properly rescaled and re-centered converge to the standard multiplicative coalescent.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.