Paper detail

BLR Physical Conditions in Extreme Population A Quasars: a Method to Estimate Central Black Hole Mass at High Redshift

We describe a method for determination of physical conditions in the broad line regions of a significant subsample of Seyfert-1 nuclei and quasars. Several diagnostic ratios based on intermediate (AlIII 1860, SiIII 1892) and high (CIV 1549, SiIV 1397) ionization lines in the UV spectra of quasars are used to constrain density, ionization and metallicity of the emitting gas. We apply the method to two extreme Population A quasars - the prototypical NLSy1 I Zw 1 and a high-z\ NLSy1-like object, SDSS J120144.36+011611.6. We find well-defined physical conditions: low ionization (ionization parameter $< 10^{-2}$), high density (10$^{12} - 10^{13}$ cm^{-3}) and significant metal enrichment. Ionization parameter and density can be derived independently for each source with an uncertainty that is always less than $\pm 0.3$ in logarithm. We use the product density times ionization parameter to estimate the broad line region radius and the virial black hole mass. Estimates of black hole masses based on the "photoionization" analysis described in this paper are probably more accurate than those derived from the radius - luminosity correlation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.