Paper detail

Blowup for fractional NLS

We consider fractional NLS with focusing power-type nonlinearity $$i \partial_t u = (-Δ)^s u - |u|^{2 σ} u, \quad (t,x) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^N,$$ where $1/2< s < 1$ and $0 < σ< \infty$ for $s \geq N/2$ and $0 < σ\leq 2s/(N-2s)$ for $s < N/2$. We prove a general criterion for blowup of radial solutions in $\mathbb{R}^N$ with $N \geq 2$ for $L^2$-supercritical and $L^2$-critical powers $σ\geq 2s/N$. In addition, we study the case of fractional NLS posed on a bounded star-shaped domain $Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^N$ in any dimension $N \geq 1$ and subject to exterior Dirichlet conditions. In this setting, we prove a general blowup result without imposing any symmetry assumption on $u(t,x)$. For the blowup proof in $\mathbb{R}^N$, we derive a localized virial estimate for fractional NLS in $\mathbb{R}^N$, which uses Balakrishnan's formula for the fractional Laplacian $(-Δ)^s$ from semigroup theory. In the setting of bounded domains, we use a Pohozaev-type estimate for the fractional Laplacian to prove blowup.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.