Paper detail

Blow-Away in the Extreme Low-Mass Starburst Galaxy Pox~186

Pox 186 is an exceptionally small dwarf starburst galaxy hosting a stellar mass of $\sim10^5$ M$_{\odot}$. Undetected in HI (M $ < 10^6$ M$_{\odot}$) from deep 21 cm observations and with an [OIII]/[OII]\ (5007/3727) ratio of 18.3 $\pm$ 0.11, Pox~186 is a promising candidate Lyman continuum emitter. It may be a possible analog of low-mass reionization-era galaxies. We present a spatially resolved kinematic study of Pox 186 and identify two distinct ionized gas components: a broad one with $σ> 400$ \kmps, and a narrow one with $σ< 30$ \kmps. We find strikingly different morphologies between the two components and direct evidence of outflows as seen in the high velocity gas. Possible physical mechanisms driving the creation of high velocity gas seen in [OIII] are discussed, from outflow geometry to turbulent mixing between a hot (10$^6$ K) star-cluster wind and cooler (10$^4$ K) gas clouds. We find a modest mass-outflow rate of 0.022 M$_{\odot}$ \ yr$^{-1}$ with a small mass loading factor of 0.5, consistent with other low mass galaxies. Finally we compare the mass-loading factor of Pox~186 with extrapolations from numerical simulations and discuss possible reasons for the apparent discrepancy between them.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.