Paper detail

Blockage-Peeking Game of Mobile Strategic Nodes in Millimeter Wave Communications

Given the importance of line-of-sight in mmWave communications, a strategic adversary can harm a transmission by obstructing the receiver, which in turn can react by trying to move around this hurdle. To expand on this point, we study one such scenario from the perspective of game theory, considering a mobile mmWave receiver and an adversary interacting strategically as players in a zero-sum game, where they want to maximize, or respectively minimize, the spectral efficiency of the communication. To do so, the adversary attempts at screening the receiver's line of sight as an obstacle, while the receiver can move around so as to avoid the blockage. We consider preset distances and the choices available to the players are to change their angular coordinates to go around each other. This is framed as a static game of complete information, for which we numerically find the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies, drawing some interesting conclusions such as connecting it with the beamforming pattern of the transmitter.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.