Bloch Radii Repulsion in Separable Two-Qubit Systems

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Milz and Strunz recently reported substantial evidence to further support the previously conjectured separability probability of 833\frac{8}{33} for two-qubit systems (ρρ) endowed with Hilbert-Schmidt measure. Additionally, they found that along the radius (rr) of the Bloch ball representing either of the two single-qubit subsystems, this value appeared constant (but jumping to unity at the locus of the pure states, r=1r=1). Further, they also observed (personal communication) such separability probability rr-invariance, when using, more broadly, random induced measure (K=3,4,5,…K=3,4,5,\ldots), with K=4K=4 corresponding to the (symmetric) Hilbert-Schmidt case. Among the findings here is that this invariance is maintained even after splitting the separability probabilities into those parts arising from the determinantal inequality ∣ρPT∣>∣ρ∣|ρ^{PT}| >|ρ| and those from ∣ρ∣>∣ρPT∣>0|ρ| > |ρ^{PT}| >0, where the partial transpose is indicated. The nine-dimensional set of generic two-re[al]bit states endowed with Hilbert-Schmidt measure is also examined, with similar rr-invariance conclusions. Contrastingly, two-qubit separability probabilities based on the Bures (minimal monotone) measure {\it diminish} with rr. Moreover, we study the forms that the separability probabilities take as joint (bivariate) functions of the radii (rA,rBr_A, r_B) of the Bloch balls of {\it both} single-qubit subsystems. Here, a form of Bloch radii {\it repulsion} for separable two-qubit systems emerges in {\it all} our several analyses. Separability probabilities tend to be smaller when the lengths of the two radii are closer. In Appendix A, we report certain companion analytic results for the much-investigated, more amenable (7-dimensional) XX-states model.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.