Paper detail

BLMA: A Blind Matching Algorithm with Application to Cognitive Radio Networks

We consider a two-sided matching problem with a defined notion of pairwise stability. We propose a distributed blind matching algorithm (BLMA) to solve the problem. We prove the solution produced by BLMA will converge to an $ε$-pairwise stable outcome with probability one. We then consider a matching problem in cognitive radio networks. Secondary users (SUs) are allowed access time to the spectrum belonging to the primary users (PUs) provided that they relay primary messages. We propose a realization of the BLMA to produce an $ε$-pairwise stable solution assuming quasi-convex and quasi-concave utilities. In the case of more general utility forms, we show another BLMA realization to provide a stable solution. Furthermore, we propose negotiation mechanism to bias the algorithm towards one side of the market. We use this mechanism to protect the exclusive rights of the PUs to the spectrum. In all such implementations of the BLMA, we impose a limited information exchange in the network so that agents can only calculate their own utilities, but no information is available about the utilities of any other users in the network.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.