Paper detail

Blazars in the early Universe

We investigate the relative occurrence of radio--loud and radio-quiet quasars in the first billion years of the Universe, powered by black holes heavier than one billion solar masses. We consider the sample of high-redshfit blazars detected in the hard X-ray band in the 3-years all sky survey performed by the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) onboard the Swift satellite. All the black holes powering these blazars exceed a billion solar mass, with accretion luminosities close to the Eddington limit. For each blazar pointing at us, there must be hundreds of similar sources (having black holes of similar masses) pointing elsewhere. This puts constraints on the density of billion solar masses black holes at high redshift (z>4), and on the relative importance of (jetted) radio-loud vs radio-quiet sources. We compare the expected number of high redshift radio--loud sources with the high luminosity radio-loud quasars detected in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), finding agreement up to z~3, but a serious deficit at z>3 of SDSS radio-loud quasars with respect to the expectations. We suggest that the most likely explanations for this disagreement are: i) the ratio of blazar to misaligned radio-sources decreases by an order of magnitude above z=3, possibly as a result of a decrease of the average bulk Lorentz factor; ii) the SDSS misses a large fraction of radio-loud sources at high redshifts, iii) the SDSS misses both radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars at high redshift, possibly because of obscuration or because of collimation of the optical-UV continuum in systems accreting near Eddington. These explanations imply very different number density of heavy black holes at high redshifts, that we discuss in the framework of the current ideas about the relations of dark matter haloes at high redshifts and the black hole they host.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.