Paper detail

Blazar nature of high-z radio-loud quasars

We report on the Swift/XRT observation and classification of eleven blazar candidates at $z>4$. These sources were selected as part of a sample of extremely radio-loud quasars, in order to focus on quasars with jets oriented roughly close to our line-of-sight. Deriving their viewing angles and their jets bulk Lorentz factors was crucial for a strict blazar classification, and it was possible only thanks to X-ray observations. Out of eleven sources, five show strong and hard X-ray fluxes, that allow their blazar classification, two are uncertain, three host relativistic jets that we observe just outside their beaming cone (i.e. are not strictly blazars), while one went undetected by Swift/XRT. Following this approach, we were able to trace the $>10^9M_\odot$ active supermassive black hole population hosted in jetted active galactic nuclei. At $z\geq4$ the massive jetted sources are likely predominant in the overall quasar population: this calls for a deep review of our understanding of the first supermassive black holes formation and evolution. Jets are indeed key actors in fast accretion, and must be searched for across the whole high redshift quasar population. A note of caution must be added: radio-loudness and in general radio features at high redshifts seem not to perfectly reflect high-energy properties. A strong effect due to interaction with CMB radiation is surely in place, that quenches the radio emission with respect to the X-rays, but also more frequent occasions for the jet to be bent seem to play a relevant role in this matter. Classifications and population studies thus must be carefully performed, in order not to be confused by these inconsistencies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.