Paper detail

Blazar Compton efficiencies: Fermi, external photons and the Sequence

The Fermi-LAT survey provides a large sample of blazars selected on the strength of their inverse Compton emission. We cross-correlate the first Fermi-LAT catalogue with the CRATES radio catalogue and use this sample to investigate whether blazar gamma-ray luminosities are influenced by the availability of external photons to be up-scattered. Using the 8.4 GHz flux densities of their compact radio cores as a proxy for their jet power, we calculate their Compton Efficiency parameters, which measure the ability of jets to convert power in the form of ultra-relativistic electrons into Compton gamma-rays. We find no clear differences in Compton efficiencies between BL Lac objects and FSRQs and no anti-correlation between Compton efficiency and synchrotron peak frequency. This suggests that the scattering of external photons is energetically unimportant compared to the synchrotron self-Compton process. These results contradict the predictions of the blazar sequence.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.