Paper detail

Black Holes or Firewalls: A Theory of Horizons

We present a quantum theory of black hole (and other) horizons, in which the standard assumptions of complementarity are preserved without contradicting information theoretic considerations. After the scrambling time, the quantum mechanical structure of a black hole becomes that of an eternal black hole at the microscopic level. In particular, the stretched horizon degrees of freedom and the states entangled with them can be mapped into the near-horizon modes in the two exterior regions of an eternal black hole, whose mass is taken to be that of the evolving black hole at each moment. Salient features arising from this picture include: (i) the number of degrees of freedom needed to describe a black hole is e^{A/2 l_P^2}, where A is the area of the horizon; (ii) black hole states having smooth horizons span only an e^{A/4 l_P^2}-dimensional subspace of the relevant e^{A/2 l_P^2}-dimensional Hilbert space; (iii) internal dynamics of the horizon is such that an infalling observer finds a smooth horizon with probability 1 if a state stays in this subspace. We identify the structure of local operators in the exterior and interior spacetime regions, and show that this structure avoids firewall arguments---the horizon can keep being smooth throughout the evolution. We discuss the fate of falling observers under various circumstances, especially when they manipulate degrees of freedom before entering the horizon, and find that an observer can never see a firewall by making a measurement on early Hawking radiation. We also consider the framework in an infalling reference frame, and argue that Minkowski-like vacua are not unique. In particular, the number of true Minkowski vacua is infinite, although the label discriminating these vacua cannot be accessed in usual non-gravitational quantum field theory. An application to de Sitter horizons is also discussed.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.