Paper detail

Black Hole Starvation and Bulge Evolution in a Milky Way-like Galaxy

We present a new zoom-in hydrodynamical simulation, "Erisbh", which follows the cosmological evolution and feedback effects of a supermassive black hole at the center of a Milky Way-type galaxy. ErisBH shares the same initial conditions, resolution, recipes of gas cooling, star formation and feedback, as the close Milky Way-analog "Eris", but it also includes prescriptions for the formation, growth and feedback of supermassive black holes. We find that the galaxy's central black hole grows mainly through mergers with other black holes coming from infalling satellite galaxies. The growth by gas accretion is minimal because very little gas reaches the sub-kiloparsec scales. The final black hole is, at z=0, about 2.6 million solar masses and it sits closely to the position of SgrA* on the MBH-MBulge and MBH-sigma planes, in a location consistent with what observed for pseudobulges. Given the limited growth due to gas accretion, we argue that the mass of the central black hole should be above 10^5 solar masses already at z~8. The effect of AGN feedback on the host galaxy is limited to the very central few hundreds of parsecs. Despite being weak, AGN feedback seems to be responsible for the limited growth of the central bulge with respect to the original Eris, which results in a significantly flatter rotation curve in the inner few kiloparsecs. Moreover, the disk of ErisBH is more prone to instabilities, as its bulge is smaller and its disk larger then Eris. As a result, the disk of ErisBH undergoes a stronger dynamical evolution relative to Eris and around z=0.3 a weak bar grows into a strong bar of a few disk scale lengths in size. The bar triggers a burst of star formation in the inner few hundred parsecs, provides a modest amount of new fuel to the central black hole, and causes the bulge of ErisBH to have, by z=0, a box/peanut morphology.(Abridged)

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.