Paper detail

Black hole spin-down by truncated disc emission

The influence of disc radiation capture upon black hole rotational evolution is negligible for radiatively inefficient discs. For the standard thin disc model it is a slight but potentially important effect leading to the equilibrium spin parameter value of about 0.998. For optically thin discs, the fraction of disc radiation captured by the black hole is however about two times larger. In some disc radiation models, inner parts of the accretion flow are optically thin, advection-dominated flows, and the thin disc ends at some transition radius R_{tr}. The thermal energy of the disc stored in trapped radiation is released at this radius. Angular distribution of the radiation released at this radial photosphere facilitates its capture by the black hole. For accretion rates close to critical and disc truncation radius of (2..4) GM/c^2, radiation capture is most efficient in spinning the black hole down that may lead to a_{eq} ~ 0.996..0.997 or less depending on the mass accretion rate. For an accretion flow radiating some constant fraction εof dissipated energy, the equilibrium Kerr parameter is shown to obey the relation 1-a_{eq} \propto ε^{3/2} as long as 1-a_{eq} << 1. Deviations from Keplerian law near the last stable orbit dominate over the radiation capture effect if they exceed 1..2%.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.