Paper detail

Black Hole Olympics: Metric Selection from the Event Horizon Telescope and LIGO-VIRGO Observations

We propose a new paradigm in the field of black hole physics, i.e., with more and more high precision observations, one must make a metric selection to determine which black hole is observationally preferred. In light of the shadow imaging data from the Event Horizon Telescope and gravitational wave measurements from the LIGO-VIRGO collaboration, we attempt to address this issue. Although not finding any obvious preference for a specific black hole metric based on current data, as a presentation of this new research paradigm, we rank these black hole metrics using the Bayesian information criterion. We find that Kerr and Reissner-Nordström tie the first place in the black hole Olympics Games. Interestingly, we give the $2\,σ$ upper bound of the average electronic charge $Q<2.82\times10^{18}$ C for the Reissner-Nordström spacetime, and the $2\,σ$ constraint on the average spin parameter $a=-0.02^{+4.07}_{-4.04}$ m for the Kerr spacetime, which is consistent with the prediction of zero rotation for a distant observer. Future multi-messenger and multi-wavelength observations will enhance the application of this new paradigm into tests of gravitational theories and black holes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.