Paper detail

Black hole-neutron star coalescence: effects of the neutron star spin on jet launching and dynamical ejecta mass

Black hole-neutron star (BHNS) mergers are thought to be sources of gravitational waves (GWs) with coincident electromagnetic (EM) counterparts. To further probe whether these systems are viable progenitors of short gamma-ray bursts (sGRBs) and kilonovae, and how one may use (the lack of) EM counterparts associated with LIGO/Virgo candidate BHNS GW events to sharpen parameter estimation, we study the impact of neutron star spin in BHNS mergers. Using dynamical spacetime magnetohydrodynamic simulations of BHNSs initially on a quasicircular orbit, we survey configurations that differ in the BH spin ($a_{\rm BH}/M_{\rm BH}=0$ and $0.75$), the NS spin ($a_{\rm NS}/M_{\rm NS}=-0.17,\,0,\,0.23$ and $0.33$), and the binary mass ratio ($q\equiv M_{\rm BH}:M_{\rm NS}=3:1$ and $5:1$). The general trend we find is that increasing the NS prograde spin increases both the rest mass of the accretion disk onto the remnant black hole, and the rest mass of dynamically ejected matter. By a time~$Δt\sim 3500-5500M\sim 88-138(M_{\rm NS}/1.4M_\odot)\,\rm ms$ after the peak gravitational wave amplitude, a magnetically--driven jet is launched only for $q=3:1$ regardless of the initial NS spin. The lifetime of the jets [$Δt\sim 0.5-0.8(M_{\rm NS}/1.4 M_\odot)\,\rm s$] and their outgoing Poynting luminosity [$L_{\rm Poyn}\sim 10^{51.5\pm 0.5}\,\rm erg/s$] are consistent with typical sGRBs luminosities and expectations from the Blandford-Znajek mechanism. By the time we terminate our simulations, we do not observe either an outflow or a large-scale magnetic field collimation for the other systems we considered. The mass range of dynamically ejected matter is $10^{-4.5}-10^{-2}~(M_{\rm NS}/1.4M_\odot)M_\odot$, which can power kilonovae with peak bolometric luminosities $L_{\rm knova}\sim 10^{40}-10^{41.4}$ erg/s with rise times $\lesssim 6.5\,\rm h$ and potentially detectable by the LSST.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.