Paper detail

Black hole-neutron star binary merger: Dependence on black hole spin orientation and equations of state

We systematically performed numerical-relativity simulations for black hole (BH) - neutron star (NS) binary mergers with a variety of the BH spin orientation and equations of state (EOS) of the NS. The initial misalignment angles of the BH spin are chosen in the range of i_tilt,0 = 30--90[deg.]. We employed four models of NS EOS with which the compactness of the NS is in the range of C = M_NS/R_NS = 0.138--0.180, where M_NS and R_NS are the mass and the radius of the NS, respectively. The mass ratio of the BH to the NS, Q = M_BH/M_NS, and the dimensionless spin parameter of the BH, chi, are chosen to be Q = 5 and chi = 0.75, together with M_NS = 1.35 M_sun. We obtain the following results: (i) The inclination angle of i_tilt,0 < 70[deg.] and i_tilt,0 < 50[deg.] are required for the formation of a remnant disk with its mass larger than 0.1 M_sun for the case C = 0.140 and C = 0.160, respectively, while the disk mass is always smaller than 0.1M_sun for C = 0.175. The ejecta with its mass larger than 0.01 M_sun is obtained for i_tilt,0 < 85[deg.] with C = 0.140, for i_tilt,0 < 65[deg.] with C = 0.160, and for i_tilt,0 < 30[deg.] with C = 0.175. (ii) The rotational axis of the dense part of the remnant disk is approximately aligned with the remnant BH spin for i_tilt,0 = 30[deg.]. On the other hand, the disk axis is misaligned initially with ~ 30[deg.] for i_tilt,0 = 60[deg.], and the alignment with the remnant BH spin is achieved at ~ 50--60 ms after the onset of merger. The accretion time scale of the remnant disk is typically ~ 100 ms and depends only weakly on the misalignment angle and the EOS. (iii) The ejecta velocity is typically ~ 0.2--0.3c and depends only weakly on i_tilt,0 and the EOS of the NS, while the morphology of the ejecta depends on its mass. (iv) The gravitational-wave spectra contains the information of the NS compactness in the cutoff frequency for i_tilt,0 < 60[deg.].

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.