Paper detail

Black hole mergers in compact star clusters and massive black hole formation beyond the mass-gap

We present direct N-body simulations, carried out with Nbody6++GPU, of young and compact low metallicity star clusters with $1.1\times 10^5$ stars, a velocity dispersion of $\sim$ 10 $\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$, a half mass radius $R_h=0.6$ pc, and a binary fraction of $10\%$ including updated evolution models for stellar winds and pair-instability supernovae (PISNe). Within the first tens of megayears of evolution, each cluster hosts several black hole (BH) merger events which nearly cover the complete mass range of primary and secondary BH masses for current LIGO/Virgo/Kagra gravitational wave detections. The importance of gravitational recoil is estimated statistically. We present several possible formation paths of massive BHs above the assumed lower PISNe mass-gap limit ($45 M_\odot$) into the intermediate-mass BH (IMBH) regime ($> 100 M_\odot$) which include collisions of stars and BHs as well as the direct collapse of stellar merger remnants with low mass cores. The stellar evolution updates result in the early formation of higher mass stellar BHs than for the previous model. The resulting higher collision rates with massive stars support the rapid formation of massive BHs. For models assuming a high accretion efficiency for star-BH mergers, we present a first-generation formation scenario for GW190521-like events, a merger of two BHs in the PISN mass-gap, which is dominated by star-BH mergers. This IMBH formation path is independent of gravitational recoil and therefore conceivable in dense stellar systems with low escape velocities. One simulated cluster even forms an IMBH binary (153$M_\odot$,173$M_\odot$) which is expected to merge within a Hubble time.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.