Paper detail

Black hole masses of weak emission line quasars based on continuum fit method

We studied optical-ultraviolet spectral energy distribution of 10 weak emission-line quasars (WLQs) which lie at redshifts z = 0.19 and 1.43 < z < 3.48. The theoretical models of their accretion disk continua are created based on the Novikov-Thorne equations. It allows us to estimate masses of their supermassive black holes (MBH) and accretion rates. We determined the virial factor for WLQs and note its anti-correlation with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Hbeta emission-line (f propto FWHM^(alpha), alpha = (-1.34 +/- 0.37)). By comparison with the previously estimated BH masses, the underestimation of MBH is noticed with a mean factor 4-5 which depends on the measured full width. We proposed the new formula to estimate MBH in WLQs based on their observed FWHM (H beta) and luminosities at 5100 A. In our opinion, WLQs are also normal quasars visible in a reactivation stage.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.