Paper detail

Bivariate trinomials over finite fields

We study the number of points in the family of plane curves defined by a trinomial \[ \mathcal{C}(α,β)= \{(x,y)\in\mathbb{F}_q^2\,:\,αx^{a_{11}}y^{a_{12}}+βx^{a_{21}}y^{a_{22}}=x^{a_{31}}y^{a_{32}}\} \] with fixed exponents (not collinear) and varying coefficients over finite fields. We prove that each of these curves has an almost predictable number of points, given by a closed formula that depends on the coefficients, exponents, and the field, with a small error term $N(α,β)$ that is bounded in absolute value by $2\tilde{g}q^{1/2}$, where $\tilde{g}$ is a constant that depends only on the exponents and the field. A formula for $\tilde{g}$ is provided, as well as a comparison of $\tilde{g}$ with the genus $g$ of the projective closure of the curve over $\overline{\mathbb{F}_q}$. We also give several linear and quadratic identities for the numbers $N(α,β)$ that are strong enough to prove the estimate above, and in some cases, to characterize them completely.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.