Paper detail

Bivariance, Grothendieck duality and Hochschild homology, II: the fundamental class of a flat scheme-map

Fix a noetherian scheme S. For any flat map f: X->Y of separated essentially-finite-type perfect S-schemes we define a canonical derived-category map c(f):\H(X)->f^!\H(Y), the fundamental class of f, where \H(Z) is the (pre-)Hochschild complex of an S-scheme Z and f^! is the twisted inverse image coming from Grothendieck duality theory. When Y=S and f is essentially smooth of relative dimension n, this gives an isomorphism from n-th degree relative differential forms [ =H^{-n}(\H(X)) ] to f^!O_S[-n]. The basic results concern transitivity of c(-) vis-à-vis compositions X->Y->Z, and compatibility of c(-) with flat base change. These properties imply that c(-) orients the flat maps in the bivariant theory of part I, compatibly with essentially étale base change. Furthermore, c(-) leads to a dual oriented bivariant theory, whose homology is the classical Hochschild homology of flat S-schemes. When Y=S, c(-) is used to define a duality map \H(X)->RHom(\H(X),f^!O_S), an isomorphism if f is essentially smooth. These results apply in particular to flat essentially finite type maps of noetherian rings.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.