Paper detail

Bivariables and Vénéreau polynomials

We study a family of polynomials introduced by Daigle and Freudenburg, which contains the famous Vénéreau polynomials and defines $\mathbb{A}^2$-fibrations over $\mathbb{A}^2$. According to the Dolgachev-Weisfeiler conjecture, every such fibration should have the structure of a locally trivial $\mathbb{A}^2$-bundle over $\mathbb{A}^2$. We follow an idea of Kaliman and Zaidenberg to show that these fibrations are locally trivial $\mathbb{A}^2$-bundles over the punctured plane, all of the same specific form $X_f$, depending on an element $f\in k[a^{\pm 1},b^{\pm 1}][x]$. We then introduce the notion of bivariables and show that the set of bivariables is in bijection with the set of locally trivial bundles $X_f$ that are trivial. This allows us to give another proof of Lewis's result stating that the second Vénéreau polynomial is a variable and also to trivialise other elements of the family $X_f$. We hope that the terminology and methods developed here may lead to future study of the whole family $X_f$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.