Paper detail

Bits and Pieces: Understanding Information Decomposition from Part-whole Relationships and Formal Logic

Partial information decomposition (PID) seeks to decompose the multivariate mutual information that a set of source variables contains about a target variable into basic pieces, the so called "atoms of information". Each atom describes a distinct way in which the sources may contain information about the target. In this paper we show, first, that the entire theory of partial information decomposition can be derived from considerations of elementary parthood relationships between information contributions. This way of approaching the problem has the advantage of directly characterizing the atoms of information, instead of taking an indirect approach via the concept of redundancy. Secondly, we describe several intriguing links between PID and formal logic. In particular, we show how to define a measure of PID based on the information provided by certain statements about source realizations. Furthermore, we show how the mathematical lattice structure underlying PID theory can be translated into an isomorphic structure of logical statements with a particularly simple ordering relation: logical implication. The conclusion to be drawn from these considerations is that there are three isomorphic "worlds" of partial information decomposition, i.e. three equivalent ways to mathematically describe the decomposition of the information carried by a set of sources about a target: the world of parthood relationships, the world of logical statements, and the world of antichains that was utilized by Williams and Beer in their original exposition of PID theory. We additionally show how the parthood perspective provides a systematic way to answer a type of question that has been much discussed in the PID field: whether a partial information decomposition can be uniquely determined based on concepts other than redundant information.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.