Paper detail

Bit flipping and time to recover

We call `bits' a sequence of devices indexed by positive integers, where every device can be in two states: $0$ (idle) and $1$ (active). Start from the `ground state' of the system when all bits are in $0$-state. In our first Binary Flipping (BF) model, the evolution of the system is the following: at each time step choose one bit from a given distribution $\mathcal{P}$ on the integers independently of anything else, then flip the state of this bit to the opposite. In our second Damaged Bits (DB) model a `damaged' state is added: each selected idling bit changes to active, but selecting an active bit changes its state to damaged in which it then stays forever. In both models we analyse the recurrence of the system's ground state when no bits are active. We present sufficient conditions for both BF and DB models to show recurrent or transient behaviour, depending on the properties of $\mathcal{P}$. We provide a bound for fractional moments of the return time to the ground state for the BF model, and prove a Central Limit Theorem for the number of active bits for both models.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.