Paper detail

Bistability and equilibria of creased annular sheets and strips

A creased thin disk is generally bistable since the crease could be pushed through to form a stable cone-like inverted state with an elastic singularity corresponding to the vertex of the conical surface. In a recent study, we found that this bistability could be destroyed by removing the singularity through cutting a hole around the vertex, depending on the size and shape of the hole. This paper extends our recent work and is based on the following observations in tabletop models of creased disks with circular holes: (i) reducing the circumference of the creased disk by removing an annular sector could increase the hole size to be as large as the disk without destroying the bistability, (ii) with a single crease, the circular hole could be as large as the disk without loss of the bistability, and (iii) a family of stable inverted states can be obtained by inverting the disk almost anywhere along the crease. An inextensible strip model is implemented to investigate these phenomena. We formulate a minimal facet of the creased disk as a two-point boundary value problem with the creases modeled as nonlinear hinges, and use numerical continuation to conduct parametric studies. Specifically, we focus on geometric parameters which include an angle deficit that determines the circumference of the disk, the rest crease angle, the number of evenly distributed creases, and an eccentricity that determines the position of the hole on the crease. Our numerical results confirm the qualitative observations in (i)-(iii) and further reveal unexpected results caused by the coupling between these geometric parameters. Our results demonstrate that by varying the geometry of a simply creased disk, surprisingly rich nonlinear behaviors can be obtained, which shed new light on the mechanics and design of origami, kirigami, and morphable structures.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.