Paper detail

Birth of convective low-mass to high-mass second Larson cores

Stars form as an end product of the gravitational collapse of cold, dense gas in magnetized molecular clouds. This multi-scale scenario occurs via the formation of two quasi-hydrostatic cores and involves complex physical processes, which require a robust, self-consistent numerical treatment. The aim of this study is to understand the formation and evolution of the second Larson core and the dependence of its properties on the initial cloud core mass. We used the PLUTO code to perform high resolution, 1D and 2D RHD collapse simulations. We include self-gravity and use a grey FLD approximation for the radiative transfer. Additionally, we use for the gas EOS density- and temperature-dependent thermodynamic quantities to account for the effects such as dissociation, ionisation, and molecular vibrations and rotations. Properties of the second core are investigated using 1D studies spanning a wide range of initial cloud core masses from 0.5 to 100 $M_{\odot}$. Furthermore, we expand to 2D collapse simulations for a few cases of 1, 5, 10, and 20 $M_{\odot}$. We follow the evolution of the second core for $\geq$ 100 years after its formation, for each of these non-rotating cases. Our results indicate a dependence of several second core properties on the initial cloud core mass. For the first time, due to an unprecedented resolution, our 2D non-rotating collapse studies indicate that convection is generated in the outer layers of the second core, which is formed due to the gravitational collapse of a 1 $M_{\odot}$ cloud core. Additionally, we find large-scale oscillations of the second accretion shock front triggered by the standing accretion shock instability, which has not been seen before in early evolutionary stages of stars. We predict that the physics within the second core would not be significantly influenced by the effects of magnetic fields or an initial cloud rotation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.