Paper detail

BIQ2021: A Large-Scale Blind Image Quality Assessment Database

The assessment of the perceptual quality of digital images is becoming increasingly important as a result of the widespread use of digital multimedia devices. Smartphones and high-speed internet are just two examples of technologies that have multiplied the amount of multimedia content available. Thus, obtaining a representative dataset, which is required for objective quality assessment training, is a significant challenge. The Blind Image Quality Assessment Database, BIQ2021, is presented in this article. By selecting images with naturally occurring distortions and reliable labeling, the dataset addresses the challenge of obtaining representative images for no-reference image quality assessment. The dataset consists of three sets of images: those taken without the intention of using them for image quality assessment, those taken with intentionally introduced natural distortions, and those taken from an open-source image-sharing platform. It is attempted to maintain a diverse collection of images from various devices, containing a variety of different types of objects and varying degrees of foreground and background information. To obtain reliable scores, these images are subjectively scored in a laboratory environment using a single stimulus method. The database contains information about subjective scoring, human subject statistics, and the standard deviation of each image. The dataset's Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) make it useful for assessing visual quality. Additionally, the proposed database is used to evaluate existing blind image quality assessment approaches, and the scores are analyzed using Pearson and Spearman's correlation coefficients. The image database and MOS are freely available for use and benchmarking.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.