Paper detail

Bipolar jets launched from accretion disks. II. Formation of symmetric and asymmetric jets and counter jets

We investigate the jet launching process from accretion disks extending our recent study (paper I) to a truly bipolar setup. We perform axisymmetric MHD simulations of the disk-jet interaction on a computational domain covering both hemispheres, in particular addressing the question of an intrinsically asymmetric origin of jet / counter jet systems. Treating both hemispheres simultaneously, we overcome the equatorial plane symmetry boundary condition used in most previous studies which naturally fosters a symmetric evolution. For the magnetic diffusivity prescription we apply an alpha-parametrisation, considering both, globally models of diffusivity, and local models. We first approve the quality of our numerical setup by generating perfectly symmetric jets, lasting over a 1000s of dynamical time scales. We then disturb the hemispheric symmetry in the disk, and investigate the subsequent evolution of the outflow. The evolution first leads to a substantial disk warping with electric currents intersecting the equatorial plane. We investigate two models, i) a disk with (initially) different thermal scale height in both hemispheres, and ii) a symmetric disk into which a local disturbance is injected in one hemisphere. In both cases the disk asymmetry results in asymmetric outflows with mass fluxes differing by 10-20%. We find up to 30% difference in mass flux between jet and counter jet for this setup, lasting over 1000s of dynamical time scales (i.e. lasting for the whole simulation). In summary, our results suggest that the jet asymmetries in protostellar and extragalactic jets can indeed be generated intrinsically and maintained over long time by disk asymmetries and the standard jet launching mechanism.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.