Paper detail

Bipolar and unipolar electrical fatigue in ferroelectric lead zirconate titanate thin films: an experimental comparison study

By performing standard PUND (positive-up-negative-down), hysteresis-loop and dielectric measurements on the ferroelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin-film capacitors subject to bipolar/unipolar electrical cycling, we show that unipolar fatigue is evident though still less severe than bipolar fatigue conducted at the same voltage. That has been attributed to polarization retention (backswitching) induced by the residual depolarization field between the monopolar pulses where the applied field is lower than the depolarization field, and explained using the LPD-SICI model (LPD-SICI stands for local phase decomposition caused by switching-induced charge injection). The conventional view that switching does not occur during unipolar electrical cycling may need to be corrected. PUND results recorded using the pulses of the same voltage as those for repetitive fatigue cycling are not reliable if the voltage is lower than 2Vc (Vc is the saturated coercive voltage). Dielectric measurements or hysteresis-loop measurements at higher voltages (e.g. 4Vc) are more reliable ways to evaluate the degree of fatigue and could provide more valuable information in such situations. Finally, dielectric results have been used to estimate the effective thickness di of the fatigue-induced degraded (pyrochlorelike) interfacial layer after bipolar/unipolar fatigue, which has not been done so far to our best knowledge. The fact that di is still much less than the film thickness even after the most severe bipolar fatigue strongly suggests that polarization fatigue in ferroelectrics is an interface effect, not a bulk one.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.