Paper detail

Bipartite graphs are weak antimagic

The \emph{Antimagic Graph Conjecture} asserts that every connected graph $G = (V, E)$ except $K_2$ admits an edge labeling such that each label $1, 2, ..., |E|$ is used exactly once and the sums of the labels on all edges incident with a given node are distinct. We study an associated counting function (replacing the upper bound on the possible labels by a variable) and prove that a variant of this counting function, when we do not require the labels to be distinct, is a polynomial if $G$ is bipartite. As a consequence, we show that every connected bipartite graph $G = (V, E)$ except $K_2$ admits a \emph{weakly} antimagic labeling, that is, each edge label is among $1, 2, ..., |E|$ (repetition allowed) and the sums of the labels on all edges incident with a given node are distinct. We also present a natural extension of these results to directed and bidirected graphs; this extension gives rise to a (bi-)directed version of the Antimagic Graph Conjecture, which might be of independent interest.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.