Paper detail

Biosorption of Cr(VI)_ and Cr(III)_Arthrobacter species

The biosorption of Cr(VI)_ and Cr(III)_ Arthrobacter species (Arthrobacter globiformis and Arthrobacter oxidas) was studied simultaneous application dialysis and atomic absorption analysis. Also biosorption of Cr(VI) in the presence of Zn(II) during growth of Arthrobacter species and Cr(III) in the presence of Mn(II) were discussed. Comparative Cr(VI)_ and Cr(III)_ Arthrobacter species shown, that Cr(III) was more effectively adsorbed by both bacterium than Cr(VI). The adsorption capacity is the same for both the Chromium-Arthrobacter systems. The biosorption constants for Cr(III) is higher than for Cr(VI) 5.7-5.9- fold for both species. Comparative Freundlich biosorption characteristics Cr(VI) Arthrobacter species of living and dry cells shown, that capacity(n) is in both cases the same(1.25,1.35). Dry cells have larger biosorption constant for both species, than living cells. Biosorption characteristics (K) and (n) for A. oxidas are without Mn(II) and in the presence of Mn(II) 2.6 x 10-4 (K), 1.37 (n) and 2.4 x 10-4 (K), 1.41 (n) respectively; for A. globiformis without Mn(II) and in the presence of Mn(II) 2.0 x 10-4 (K), 1.23 (n) and 1.9 x 10-4 (K), 1.47 (n) respectively. Thus, Biosorption characteristics did not change in the presence of Mn(II) ions.. It was shown, that bioavailability increases in the presence of Zn ions in both cases. (for Cr(VI)-Arthrobacter globiformis and for Cr(VI)- Arthrobacter oxidas). Biosorption characteristics (K) and (n) for A. oxides in the absence and in the presence of Zn(II) are 4.6 x 10-4 (K), 1.25 (n) and 6.6 x 10-4, 1.08 (n) respectively, for A. globiformis without Zn(II) and in the presence of Zn(II) 3.4 x 10-4 (K), 1.35 (n) and 8.1 x 10-4 (K), 1.19 (n) respectively; n values did not change. But for Cr(VI)-Arthrobacter globiformis increase is more significant.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.