Paper detail

BinMLM: Binary Authorship Verification with Flow-aware Mixture-of-Shared Language Model

Binary authorship analysis is a significant problem in many software engineering applications. In this paper, we formulate a binary authorship verification task to accurately reflect the real-world working process of software forensic experts. It aims to determine whether an anonymous binary is developed by a specific programmer with a small set of support samples, and the actual developer may not belong to the known candidate set but from the wild. We propose an effective binary authorship verification framework, BinMLM. BinMLM trains the RNN language model on consecutive opcode traces extracted from the control-flow-graph (CFG) to characterize the candidate developers' programming styles. We build a mixture-of-shared architecture with multiple shared encoders and author-specific gate layers, which can learn the developers' combination preferences of universal programming patterns and alleviate the problem of low training resources. Through an optimization pipeline of external pre-training, joint training, and fine-tuning, our framework can eliminate additional noise and accurately distill developers' unique styles. Extensive experiments show that BinMLM achieves promising results on Google Code Jam (GCJ) and Codeforces datasets with different numbers of programmers and supporting samples. It significantly outperforms the baselines built on the state-of-the-art feature set (4.73% to 19.46% improvement) and remains robust in multi-author collaboration scenarios. Furthermore, BinMLM can perform organization-level verification on a real-world APT malware dataset, which can provide valuable auxiliary information for exploring the group behind the APT attack.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.