Paper detail

Binary Sequence Set Design for Interferer Rejection in Multi-Branch Modulation

Wideband communication is often expected to deal with a very wide spectrum, which in many environments of interest includes strong interferers. Thus receivers for the wideband communication systems often need to mitigate interferers to reduce the distortion caused by the amplifier nonlinearity and noise. Recently, a new architecture for communication receivers known as random modulation mixes a signal with different pseudorandom sequences using multiple branches of channels before sampling. While random modulation is used in these receivers to acquire the signal at low sampling rates, the modulation sequences used lack the ability to suppress interferers due to their flat spectra. In previous work, we introduced the design of a single spectrally shaped binary sequence that mitigates interferers to replace the pseudorandom sequence in a channel. However, the designed sequences cannot provide the stable recovery achieved by pseudorandom sequence approaches. In this paper, we extend our previous sequence design to guarantee stable recovery by designing a set of sequences to be orthogonal to each other. We show that it is difficult to find the necessary number of sequences featuring mutual orthogonality and introduce oversampling to the sequence set design to improve the recovery performance. We propose an algorithm for multi-branch sequence design as a binary optimization problem, which is solved using a semidefinite program relaxation and randomized projection. While it is common to model narrowband interferers as a subspace spanned by a subset of elements from the Fourier basis, we show that the Slepian basis provides an alternative and more suitable compact representation for signals with components contained in narrow spectrum bands. Numerical experiments using the proposed sequence sets show their advantages against pseudorandom sequences and our previous work.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.