Paper detail

Binary intermediate-mass black hole mergers in globular clusters

We consider the formation of binary intermediate black holes (BIMBH) in globular clusters (GC), which could happen either in situ or due to the mergers between clusters. We simulate the evolution of the BIMBH orbit (and its subsequent merger) due to stellar ejections. We also take into account the evaporation of GCs due to the tidal field of the host galaxy and two-body relaxation. Our results show that if at least $10^{-3}$ of all GCs become BIMBH hosts and the BIMBH masses are $\sim1\%$ of the GC mass, at least one of the inspiralling (or merging) BIMBHs will be detected by LISA during its 4-year mission lifetime. Most of the detected BIMBHs come 1) from heavy GCs ($\gtrsim3\times10^5M_\odot$), as lower-mass GCs end up being disrupted before their BIMBHs have time to merge, and 2) from redshifts $1<z<3$, assuming that most of GCs form around $z\sim4$ and given that the merger timescale for most BIMBHs is $\sim1$ Gyr. If the BIMBH to GC mass ratio is lower ($\sim10^{-3}$) but the fraction of BIMBH hosts among GCs is higher ($\gtrsim10^{-2}$), some of their mergers will also be detected by LIGO, VIRGO, and KAGRA and the proposed Einstein Telescope.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.