Paper detail

Binary Cepheids: Separations and Mass Ratios in $5\,M_\odot$ Binaries

Deriving the distribution of binary parameters for a particular class of stars over the full range of orbital separations usually requires the combination of results from many different observing techniques (radial velocities, interferometry, astrometry, photometry, direct imaging), each with selection biases. However, Cepheids---cool, evolved stars of $\sim$$5\, M_\odot$---are a special case because ultraviolet spectra will immediately reveal any companion star hotter than early type A, {\it regardless of the orbital separation}. We have used {\it International Ultraviolet Explorer} (\IUE) UV spectra of a complete sample of all 76 Cepheids brighter than V=8 to create a list of {\it all 18} Cepheids with companions more massive than $2.0\, M_\odot$. Orbital periods of many of these binaries are available from radial-velocity studies, or can be estimated for longer-period systems from detected velocity variability. In an imaging survey with the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} Wide Field Camera 3, we resolved three of the companions (those of $η$ Aql, S Nor, and V659 Cen), allowing us to make estimates of the periods out to the long-period end of the distribution. Combining these separations with orbital data in the literature, we derive an unbiased distribution of binary separations, orbital periods, and mass ratios. The distribution of orbital periods shows that the $5\, M_\odot$ binaries have systematically shorter periods than do $1\, M_\odot$ stars. Our data also suggest that the distribution of mass ratios depends both on binary separation and system multiplicity. The distribution of mass ratios as a function of orbital separation, however, does not depend on whether a system is a binary or a triple.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.