Paper detail

Binary black holes in young star clusters: the impact of metallicity

Young star clusters are the most common birth-place of massive stars and are dynamically active environments. Here, we study the formation of black holes (BHs) and binary black holes (BBHs) in young star clusters, by means of 6000 N-body simulations coupled with binary population synthesis. We probe three different stellar metallicities (Z=0.02, 0.002 and 0.0002) and two initial density regimes (density at the half-mass radius $ρ_{\rm h}\ge{}3.4\times10^4$ and $\ge{1.5\times10^2}$ M$_\odot$ pc$^{-3}$ in dense and loose star clusters, respectively). Metal-poor clusters tend to form more massive BHs than metal-rich ones. We find $\sim{}6$, $\sim{}2$, and $<1$% of BHs with mass $m_{\rm BH}>60$ M$_\odot$ at Z=0.0002, 0.002 and 0.02, respectively. In metal-poor clusters, we form intermediate-mass BHs with mass up to $\sim{}320$ M$_\odot$. BBH mergers born via dynamical exchanges (exchanged BBHs) can be more massive than BBH mergers formed from binary evolution: the former (latter) reach total mass up to $\sim{}140$ M$_\odot$ ($\sim{}80$ M$_\odot$). The most massive BBH merger in our simulations has primary mass $\sim{}88$ M$_\odot$, inside the pair-instability mass gap, and a mass ratio of $\sim{}0.5$. Only BBHs born in young star clusters from metal-poor progenitors can match the masses of GW170729, the most massive event in O1 and O2, and those of GW190412, the first unequal-mass merger. We estimate a local BBH merger rate density $\sim{}110$ and $\sim{}55$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$, if we assume that all stars form in loose and dense star clusters, respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.