Paper detail

Binary black hole mergers from young massive clusters in the pair-instability supernova mass gap

The recent discovery of the binary black hole (BBH) merger event GW190521, between two black holes (BHs) of $\approx100M_\odot$, and as well as other massive BBH merger events involving BHs within the pair-instability supernova (PSN) mass gap have sparked widespread debate on the origin of such extreme gravitational-wave (GW) events. In this study, I investigate whether dynamical interactions in young massive clusters (YMCs) serves as a viable scenario for assembling PSN-gap BBH mergers. To that end, I explore a grid of 40 new evolutionary models of a representative YMC of initial mass $M_{\rm cl}=7.5\times10^4M_\odot$ ($N\approx1.28\times10^5$) and size $r_h=2$ pc, with all BH progenitor stars being initially in primordial binaries. All cluster models are evolved with the direct, relativistic N-body code NBODY7 incorporating up to date remnant formation, BH natal spin, and general-relativistic (GR) merger recoil schemes. The BBH mergers from these model cluster computations agree well with the masses and effective spin parameters of the GW events in the latest GW transient catalogue (GWTC). In particular, GW190521-like, i.e., $\approx200M_\odot$, low aligned spin events are produced via dynamical merger among BHs derived from star-star merger products. GW190403-like, i.e., PSN-gap, highly asymmetric and aligned events result from mergers involving BHs that are spun up via matter accretion or binary interaction. The present YMC models yield a present day, intrinsic merger rate density of $0-3.8\times10^{-2}{{\rm~yr}^{-1}{\rm Gpc}^{-3}}$ for GW190521-type events. They produce GW190403-like events at a rate within $0-1.6\times10^{-1}{{\rm~yr}^{-1}{\rm Gpc}^{-3}}$ and their total BBH-merger yield within the PSN gap is $0-8.4\times10^{-1}{{\rm~yr}^{-1}{\rm Gpc}^{-3}}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.