Paper detail

Bijections for pairs of non-crossing lattice paths and walks in the plane

It is a classical result in combinatorics that among lattice paths with 2m steps U=(1,1) and D=(1,-1) starting at the origin, the number of those that do not go below the x-axis equals the number of those that end on the x-axis. A much more unfamiliar fact is that the analogous equality obtained by replacing single paths with k-tuples of non-crossing paths holds for every k. This result has appeared in the literature in different contexts involving plane partitions (where it was proved by Proctor), partially ordered sets, Young tableaux, and lattice walks, but no bijective proof for k>1 seems to be known. In this paper we give a bijective proof of the equality for k=2, showing that for pairs of non-crossing lattice paths with 2m steps U and D, the number of those that do not go below the x-axis equals the number of those that end on the x-axis. Translated in terms of walks in the plane starting at the origin with 2m unit steps in the four coordinate directions, our work provides correspondences among those constrained to the first octant, those constrained to the first quadrant that end on the x-axis, and those in the upper half-plane that end at the origin. Our bijections, which are defined in more generality, also prove new results where different endpoints are allowed, and they give a bijective proof of the formula for the number of walks in the first octant that end on the diagonal, partially answering a question of Bousquet-Mélou and Mishna.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.