Paper detail

Bijections between walks inside a triangular domain and Motzkin paths of bounded amplitude

This paper solves an open question of Mortimer and Prellberg asking for an explicit bijection between two families of walks. The first family is formed by what we name triangular walks, which are two-dimensional walks moving in six directions (0°, 60°, 120°, 180°, 240°, 300°) and confined within a triangle. The other family is comprised of two-colored Motzkin paths with bounded height, in which the horizontal steps may be forbidden at maximal height. We provide several new bijections. The first one is derived from a simple inductive proof, taking advantage of a $2^n$-to-one function from generic triangular walks to triangular walks only using directions 0°, 120°, 240°. The second is based on an extension of Mortimer and Prellberg's results to triangular walks starting not only at a corner of the triangle, but at any point inside it. It has a linear-time complexity and is in fact adjustable: by changing some set of parameters called a scaffolding, we obtain a wide range of different bijections. Finally, we extend our results to higher dimensions. In particular, by adapting the previous proofs, we discover an unexpected bijection between three-dimensional walks in a pyramid and two-dimensional simple walks confined in a bounded domain shaped like a waffle.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.