Paper detail

Big Data Quality: A systematic literature review and future research directions

One of the most significant problems of Big Data is to extract knowledge through the huge amount of data. The usefulness of the extracted information depends strongly on data quality. In addition to the importance, data quality has recently been taken into consideration by the big data community and there is not any comprehensive review conducted in this area. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and present the state of the art on the quality of big data research through a hierarchical framework. The dimensions of the proposed framework cover various aspects in the quality assessment of Big Data including 1) the processing types of big data, i.e. stream, batch, and hybrid, 2) the main task, and 3) the method used to conduct the task. We compare and critically review all of the studies reported during the last ten years through our proposed framework to identify which of the available data quality assessment methods have been successfully adopted by the big data community. Finally, we provide a critical discussion on the limitations of existing methods and offer suggestions on potential valuable research directions that can be taken in future research in this domain.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.