Paper detail

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis updated with the NACRE Compilation

We update the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis calculations on the basis of the recent NACRE compilation. The average values of the calculated abundances of light nuclei do not differ significantly from that obtained using the previous Fowler's compilation. ${^7}Li$ is slightly depressed at high baryon to photon ratio $η$. The main uncertainty concerns the $D(p,γ){^3}He$ reaction rate affecting the synthesis of ${^7}Li$ (via the ${^3}He(α,γ){^7}Be(eν){^7}Li$) at rather high baryonic density. On the left part of the lithium valley the uncertainty is strongly reduced due to the improvement of the measurement of the $T(α,γ)^{7}Li$ reaction rate. We use lithium-7 as the main baryometer, since, though much efforts have been devoted to the determination of Deuterium in absorbing clouds in the line of sight of remote quasars, the statistics is very poor compared to the long series of lithium measurements. Taking into account the lithium constraints, two possible baryonic density ranges emerge, $η_{10}= 1.4 - 1.9$ and $η_{10} = 3.3 - 5.1$. The Be and B abundances produced in the big bang are orders of magnitudes lower, and spallation of fast carbon and oxygen is probably their unique source, in the early Galaxy.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.