Paper detail

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and Entropy Evolution in $f(R,T)$ Gravity

The present article is devoted to constrain the model parameter $χ$ for the $f(R,T)= R + χT$ gravity model by employing the constraints coming from big bang nucleosynthesis. We solve the field equations and constrain $χ$ in the range $-0.14 κ^{2} \leq χ\leq 0.84 κ^{2}$ (where $κ^{2} = \frac{8 πG}{c^{4}}$) from the primordial abundances of light elements such as helium-4, deuterium and lithium-7. We found the abundances of helium-4 and deuterium agrees with theoretical predictions, however the lithium problem persists for the $f(R,T)$ gravity model. We also investigate the evolution of entropy for the constrained parameter space of $χ$ for the radiation and dust universe. We report that entropy is constant when $χ= 0$ for the radiation dominated universe, whereas for the dust universe, entropy increases with time. We finally use the constraints to show that $χ$ has negligible influence on the cold dark matter annihilation cross section.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.