Paper detail

Bifurcations in droplet collisions

Saffman and Turner (1957) argued that the collision rate for droplets in turbulence increases as the turbulent strain rate increases. But the numerical simulations of Dhanasekaran et al. (2021) in a steady straining flow show that the Saffman-Turner model is oversimplified because it neglects droplet-droplet interactions. These result in a complex dependence of the collision rate on the strain rate and on the differential settling speed. Here we show that this dependence is explained by a sequence of bifurcations in the collision dynamics. We compute the bifurcation diagram when strain is aligned with gravity, and show that it yields important insights into the collision dynamics. First, the steady-state collision rate remains non-zero in the limit Kn $\to0$, contrary to the common assumption that the collision rate tends to zero in this limit (Kn is a non-dimensional measure of the mean free path of air). Second, the non-monotonic dependence of the collision rate on the differential settling speed is explained by a grazing bifurcation. Third, the bifurcation analysis explains why so-called "closed trajectories" appear and disappear. Fourth, our analysis predicts strong spatial clustering near certain saddle points, where the effects of strain and differential settling cancel

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.