Paper detail

Bifurcation Thresholds and Optimal Control in Transmission Dynamics of Arboviral Diseases

In this paper, we derive and analyse a model for the control of arboviral diseases which takes into account an imperfect vaccine combined with some other mechanisms of control already studied in the literature. We begin by analyse the basic model without controls. We prove the existence of two disease-free equilibrium points and the possible existence of up to two endemic equilibrium points (where the disease persists in the population). We show the existence of a transcritical bifurcation and a possible saddle-node bifurcation and explicitly derive threshold conditions for both, including defining the basic reproduction number, R 0 , which determines whether the disease can persist in the population or not. The epidemiological consequence of saddle-node bifurcation (backward bifurcation) is that the classical requirement of having the reproduction number less than unity, while necessary, is no longer sufficient for disease elimination from the population. It is further shown that in the absence of disease--induced death, the model does not exhibit this phenomenon. We perform the sensitivity analysis to determine the model robustness to parameter values. That is to help us to know the parameters that are most influential in determining disease dynamics. The model is extended by reformulating the model as an optimal control problem, with the use of five time dependent controls, to assess the impact of vaccination combined with treatment, individual protection and vector control strategies (killing adult vectors, reduction of eggs and larvae). By using optimal control theory, we establish optimal conditions under which the disease can be eradicated and we examine the impact of a possible combined control tools on the disease transmission. The Pontryagin's maximum principle is used to characterize the optimal control. Numerical simulations, efficiency analysis and cost effectiveness analysis show that, vaccination combined with other control mechanisms, would reduce the spread of the disease appreciably, and this at low cost.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.