Paper detail

Bielectrons in the Dirac sea in graphene: the role of many--body effects

It was shown in PHYSICAL REVIEW B 92, 085409 (2015) that the dynamics of a pair of electrons in graphene can be mapped onto that of a single particle with negative effective mass, leading to bound states of positive energy despite the formally repulsive interaction. However, this conclusion was based on the analysis of the two--particle problem, neglecting the role of the Dirac sea and the many--body effects. The two dominant such effects at zero temperature are screening of the Coulomb interaction by the Dirac sea, and reduction of the available phase space due to Pauli blocking of transitions into the states below the Fermi level. We show that these effects result in strong renormalization of the binding energy, but do not destroy the metastable states. Thus the binding energies are strongly dependent on the chemical potential owing to the combined effects of screening and Pauli blocking. Hence, the quasibound resonances can be tuned by electrostatic doping.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.