Paper detail

Biasing and Genus Statistics of Dark Matter Halos in the Hubble Volume Simulation

We present a numerical analysis of genus statistics for dark matter halo catalogs from the Hubble volume simulation. The huge box-size of the Hubble volume simulation enables us to carry out a reliable statistical analysis of the biasing properties of halos at a Gaussian smoothing scale of R_G>30Mpc/h with a cluster-mass scale of between 7*10^{13}Msolar/h and 6*10^{15}Msolar/h. A detailed comparison of the genus for dark matter halos with that for the mass distribution shows that the non-Gaussianity induced by the halo biasing is comparable to that by nonlinear gravitational evolution, and both the shape and the amplitude of the genus are almost insensitive to the halo mass at R_G>30Mpc/h. In order to characterize the biasing effect on the genus, we apply a perturbative formula developed by Matsubara (1994). We find that the perturbative formula well describes the simulated halo genus at R_G>50Mpc/h. The result indicates that the biasing effect on the halo genus is well approximated by nonlinear deterministic biasing up to the second-order term in the mass density fluctuation. The two parameters describing the linear and quadratic terms in the nonlinear biasing accurately specify the genus for galaxy clusters.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.