Paper detail

Biases in galaxy cluster velocity dispersion and mass estimates in the small number of galaxies regime

We present a study of the statistical properties of three velocity dispersion and mass estimators, namely biweight, gapper and standard deviation, in the small number of galaxies regime ($N_{\rm gal} \le 75$). Using a set of 73 numerically simulated galaxy clusters, we characterise the statistical bias and the variance for the three estimators, both in the determination of the velocity dispersion and the dynamical mass of the clusters via the $σ-M$ relation. The results are used to define a new set of unbiased estimators, that are able to correct for those statistical biases with a minimal increase of the associated variance. The numerical simulations are also used to characterise the impact of velocity segregation in the selection of cluster members, and the impact of using cluster members within different physical radii from the cluster centre. The standard deviation is found to be the lowest variance estimator. The selection of galaxies within the sub-sample of the most massive galaxies in the cluster introduces a $2\,$\% bias in the velocity dispersion estimate when calculated using a quarter of the most massive cluster members. We also find a dependence of the velocity dispersion estimate on the aperture radius as a fraction of $R_{200}$, consistent with previous results. The proposed set of unbiased estimators effectively provides a correction of the velocity dispersion and mass estimates from all those effects in the small number of cluster members regime. This is tested by applying the new estimators to a subset of simulated observations. Although for a single galaxy cluster the statistical and physical effects discussed here are comparable or slightly smaller than the bias introduced by interlopers, they will be of relevance when dealing with ensemble properties and scaling relations for large cluster samples (Abridged).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.